jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
The most direct and high-signal way to support creators is to buy their art. NFTs made this experience digital. Subscriptions create an ongoing form of patronage. All of the above create a direct line of value transfer between the creator and their supporters. Coins don’t do this. Coins are traded through AMMs, and most of the value is *not* captured by the creator. Interesting experiments, but I still don’t understand how this is a better way of “supporting creators” than more direct, lindy alternatives.
12 replies
5 recasts
49 reactions

Rani Haddad pfp
Rani Haddad
@4484.eth
ser nobody bought an NFT to support creators. they were speculating. always have.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
didn’t a much higher % of money go into the creators pocket, though?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Rani Haddad pfp
Rani Haddad
@4484.eth
probably. but was harder to sustain value of the content. coining lowers expectations.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction