jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
The most direct and high-signal way to support creators is to buy their art. NFTs made this experience digital. Subscriptions create an ongoing form of patronage. All of the above create a direct line of value transfer between the creator and their supporters. Coins don’t do this. Coins are traded through AMMs, and most of the value is *not* captured by the creator. Interesting experiments, but I still don’t understand how this is a better way of “supporting creators” than more direct, lindy alternatives.
12 replies
5 recasts
47 reactions
Matt pfp
Matt
@mattlee
They way I think about it is there’s clearly lots of demand for speculation that have made people rich for things like creating fartcoin so why not direct some of that demand to artists instead of
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Rani Haddad pfp
Rani Haddad
@4484.eth
ser nobody bought an NFT to support creators. they were speculating. always have.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
yungwknd pfp
yungwknd
@yungwknd
Have you seen Maniframe? Such a fun way to support creators https://maniframe.vercel.app
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bence pfp
bence
@bence
i think the misalignment is in the assumption that creators aren’t supposed to extract value from the coin their supporters pump if the default is they are supposed to, then it just becomes a more fun way of giving money to people participatory vs passive support. former is winner for the platforms and non-creator user-base. creator still gets paid
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
check out what they doing with the uni v4 hooks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trish🫧 pfp
Trish🫧
@trish
Supporting direct is better
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
flick the dev 🎩📦 pfp
flick the dev 🎩📦
@flick
zora does really well for creators to capture value from speculation, if they choose to go down that path and are able to capture attention art can be a vehicle for that artist should still be selling their work on top of any extra fees! (zora lost the plot on that a long time ago, so obviously not on zora)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xZara.eth🎩 pfp
0xZara.eth🎩
@0xzara.eth
Only when the creator owns 100% of the coin from the start
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
@BestCryptoTwits pfp
@BestCryptoTwits
@bestcryptotwits
high signal vibes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NFThreat ↑ pfp
NFThreat ↑
@nfthreat.eth
+ creators won’t sell their coin allocation. Rug your fan base is not an option
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joel pfp
Joel
@jthor.eth
Not to mention that NFTs could give supporters a nice artifact. I would collect a music NFT that has high bitrate music and a high res artpiece attached to it's metadata, for the same reason I buy vinyls. I don't care if you can copy paste the metadata, as long as I can own the NFT it's a badge of patronage. Coins don't come close to achieving this.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghost 🎩 pfp
Ghost 🎩
@ghostbo4.eth
Someone give this guy a country to rule
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction