Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
Caught a fairly recent interview with Charlie Munger where he said heโ€™s against Bitcoin because he doesnโ€™t believe in its scarcity. He argued that unlike gold, if thereโ€™s enough incentive, someone will figure out how to make more of it. Thought that was an interesting take. Hope everyone has a great holiday weekend!
16 replies
2 recasts
55 reactions

๐Ÿ–๐Ÿฆ™ pfp
๐Ÿ–๐Ÿฆ™
@hammallama.eth
Makes me think of how some people were talking about quantum computers recovering lost bitcoin to go back into the pool
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

kevang30.base.eth pfp
kevang30.base.eth
@kevang30.eth
Hi Jacek, In my humble and inexpert opinion, both, gold and btc have the same opportunity. If one day there is a greater interest in gold no longer being worth anything, then that will be the case, and the price will go to the underworld. In this world, everything depends on the value we give it; the rest is unsure.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ray F. ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Ray F. ๐ŸŽฉ
@cryptowenmoon.eth
You could say the same about gold โ€” whenever new deposits are found or extraction technology improves, the supply increases. Scarcity isn't always fixed, even for gold.โ€‹ Take a look at the recent discovery in China: a "supergiant" gold deposit estimated at 1,000 metric tons, valued at over $83 billion. This find in Pingjiang County, Hunan Province, could surpass South Africa's South Deep mine in size and value. Such discoveries highlight how perceptions of scarcity can change with new findings.โ€‹
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Tail issuance is a cursed word among maxis, but itโ€™s either that or extravagant tx fees and a dead chain โ€” until then, the halvening will keep eroding the security budget with clockwork regularity. Itโ€™ll be interesting to see what maxis accept to compromise on first. Or just wrap all BTC on Ethereum, ditch the wasteful PoW chain entirely, and enshrine the 21M cap in perpetuity. Iโ€™d welcome that
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

SuperBuu.eth pfp
SuperBuu.eth
@superbuu.eth
That is a pretty wild take with the blockchain being immutable and all but tbh I first thought kind of the same thing when I first started in crypto and thought it was all a scam (after my first time getting scammed lol) If BTC was created why couldn't someone else eventually just make another token exactly the same as BTC in every detail or even better. If that was even possible (idk) sure it eventually could be though? idk random thoughts Have a great weekend cheers!๐Ÿฅ‚
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eggman ๐Ÿ”ต pfp
eggman ๐Ÿ”ต
@eggman.eth
Satoshi rubbing his hands over the hard fork to 21.1mil BTC
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Shinโ“‚๏ธoma๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ‘พ๐Ÿ– pfp
Shinโ“‚๏ธoma๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ‘พ๐Ÿ–
@shinmoma
Man really said โ€œjust print more Bitcoinโ€ like itโ€™s fiat. Respect the legend, but that take is a little cooked.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

meta-david ๐Ÿ’ฅ| Building Scoop3 pfp
meta-david ๐Ÿ’ฅ| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
I suppose one day we might find a way to divide by zero and get a finite response too
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ZAHED pfp
ZAHED
@0xzahed.eth
With all due respect, Charlie Munger does not have enough knowledge about Bitcoin's technical structure. So he would be better off not commenting!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ihawaii.eth pfp
ihawaii.eth
@ihawaii.eth
happy Good Friday
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

antimo pfp
antimo
@antimofm.eth
@askgina.eth is that even possible
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

sorenrad ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต  pfp
sorenrad ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต
@sorenrad
I think it's an interesting way of thinking.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Hamed pfp
Hamed
@hamedns
Charlie Munger has always been known for his outspoken views, and this is one of those comments that can spark a whole lot of discussion. It's not technically correct, but philosophically correct ๐ŸŽฉ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

helladj pfp
helladj
@helladj
20 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction