charts

Philosophy

I really appreciate ambition. 

I think it's important for some people to be ambitious since it is often a prerequisite to doing something great.

But there is this weird perversion with ambition that portrays it as some kind of moral good. It's not -- if anything, it's totally orthogonal.

Elevating onchain creators 

@nodefoundation @brightmoments 
@ampsfun

This graph categorizes people's behaviors and motivations based on two main factors: "morality" and "ambition."

It‘s an ordinary company that wants to be an artist

1. Evil and Highly Ambitious Character (Top Left): Darth Vader - A highly ambitious and evil character, known for his pursuit of power in the “Star Wars” series.

2. Good and Highly Ambitious Character (Top Right): Santa Claus - A very good character with great ambition, spreading happiness by delivering gifts to children worldwide.

3. Evil and Less Ambitious Character (Bottom Left): Common Thief - A morally negative figure with low ambition, committing petty crimes for survival.

4. Good and Less Ambitious Character (Bottom Right): Local Community Organizer - A morally positive figure with modest ambitions, working to bring small changes to the local community.

Based on what I know, this is how I interpreted it. Is this correct, @phil?

Horizontal Axis: The "Good" and "Evil" axis. Moving to the right represents more moral and positive characteristics, while moving to the left indicates more immoral and negative traits.

Vertical Axis: The "Ambitious" and "Less Ambitious" axis. Moving upward indicates greater ambition, while moving downward shows less ambition.