Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/law-policy
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gus
@gus
I think AI founders and investors can learn important lessons (what to do/not to do) from the last 10 years of the crypto regulatory wars. Agree? What do you think are the key lessons? Will share more as I flesh out.
3 replies
3 recasts
12 reactions
Sarah Shtylman
@shodyesq
Don’t assume existing laws do not, will not, or should not apply just because the tech is novel. Not everyone in the industry, but the crypto industry as a whole lost in both years and reputation/credibility by making this assumption.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
codeofcrypto
@codeofcrypto
Would love to learn more about the AI regulatory roadmap — really like this clip from @samuellhuber.eth on AI/Blockchain synergies.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mark mollé
@marmo.eth
Big lesson: if you don’t craft your own rules, you won’t have an affirmative narrative (and you’ll always be defending yourself against detractors who claim you’re breaking the rules). That said, it’s better landscape for AI. Crypto walked into a wall of legacy laws. Money and securities are highly regulated at fed and state level and have been for around a century. AI is a relatively new regulatory frontier. Still lots of blank space. But that void will not last: power hates a vacuum. I would advise all founders to get out in front of it and think about crafting your own narrative re risk‑based system classification, safety and bias audits, transparency of model design and data provenance, high‑risk uses, data‑governance duties, and export controls. Investors should encourage that behavior from port cos. Naming is also key. Just as no one should have ever named anything “tornado cash,” I would advise against brand names sound like an evil genius villain in some sci-fi novel.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
