Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/nearchos
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
The only reason ads get a bad wrap is because they are harvesting our user data to manipulate us with ads. Web2 is perverse, broken incentives designed to extract and control behavior. Web3 basically is the same now, just onchain. But if we built truly sovereign digital identities so people could be empowered to harness their identity data to serve themselves, suddenly ads no longer are extractive and manipulative. They are opt-in and participatory. This is the opportunity we have with web3 to build different. Will we choose the right path that leads somewhere new? Or will we choose the path that circles us back to where we started? https://farcaster.xyz/ekaitza/0x8d207778
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Garrett
@garrett
Most people don't want to custody and monetize their own data bc its too much work, too much friction Even if there were a big minority who wanted to do this, the dominant majority would still provide an alternate paradigm that most people would stick with bc its easier Needs to be seamlessly easy and simple which is why free platforms that harvest our data are dominant
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
People do what is easy, yes. Self custody is hard, yes. Right now the only option ppl have is to let centralized entities manage their data for them because they don't have easy tools to do it themselves. What kind of logic is it to say that if we build easy, accessible solutions to self custody that people will continue to opt-in to the extractive platforms that offer no actual advantage over decentralized alternatives? If you want web3 to just be a more expensive and complicated version of web2 then I really don't understand why we're all here. Let's just make web2 better without all the wasted cycles on the unnecessary Blockchains. Without self custody, there's literally no advantage to Blockchains over web2.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
