Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/ai-art
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Galerie Met pfp
Galerie Met
@galeriemet
Installation view of the current exhibition “Synthetic Realities: Authenticity in the Age of AI Imagery,” on view until June 7. Synthetic Realities: Authenticity in the Age of AI Imagery Chen Zirui Anna Condo (@a1111ac011d0) Uglyy Fruuit icysaw Jess Mac Maciej Miliszkiewicz (@mmiliszkiewicz) Niklas Poweleit Isabelita Virtual Mind Wank (@mindwank) Lilan Yang May 24 – June 07, 2025 Mariannenstrasse 33, 10999 Berlin In collaboration with @verse Sponsored by Kaiber
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Galerie Met pfp
Galerie Met
@galeriemet
The cult of authenticity is a form of moral hygiene. It punishes contradiction, demands transparency, and disguises itself as empowerment. But what if “you do you, girl” and no one likes you? What if you discover at your absolute core isn’t “all your unique gifts, skills, abilities, interests, talents, insights, and wisdom” but a rotting black mould that is boring, cruel, incoherent, and untalented? The demand for authenticity isn’t actually about truth, it is about discovering the safest and most sterile version of yourself. The so-called “authentic self” is not a source—it’s a symptom of a society that is desperate for anchors in a sea of instability. But it’s precisely in instability—those liminal, unformed zones—that subjectivity emerges as something dynamic, speculative, and even dangerous. To insist on a “true self” is to enforce a self-containment. It is to foreclose becoming in favour of coherence. It is the logic of the border, not the threshold.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Galerie Met pfp
Galerie Met
@galeriemet
Nowhere does this become more absurd than in the conversation around artificial intelligence. To demand that AI—or artists using AI—be “authentic” is to demand that something that is not fully formed, define its own conditions and boundaries of being. Yet, we must also consider the artists whose work is being ingested and fragmented by algorithms: are they—these creators whose labor is scraped, extracted, and commodified—regarded as “authentic”? Are we to believe that a photo of dog shit is more “authentic” than an illustration or painting by an underpaid artist simply because one is labeled with more certainty and more likely to be statistically represented in future iterations? ... Be sure to read the amazing text by Clint Enns: https://galeriemet.com/exhibitions/synthetic-realities-authenticity-in-the-age-of-ai-imagery
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction