Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex Loukissas ๐
@futureartist
Have folks here played with NATS? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjXIUPZ7ArM
5 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
atlasmoth
@osuji.eth
Yup, it's awesome!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rafi
@rafi
Its great. Easy to scale from one machine to many. Can be even embedded in Go program. KV store is a nice addition, too.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kostas Christidis
@kostas
been wanting to use this for almost half a decade now, but never got the chance
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tiago
@alvesjtiago.eth
This looks super interesting, first time hearing about it (canโt believe the initial release is from 2011). Thanks for sharing, Iโll probably try it out as a replacement for a simple grpc implementation (which led me to find nrpc - https://github.com/nats-rpc/nrpc).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dylan
@elffjs
Quite happy with it at work. For most of the data pipeline we use Kafka, but when we need a lot of parallelism or anticipate a lot of retries then we reach for NATS. It has a dizzying number of features and options but it runs great.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction