Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/replyguys
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
thosmur
@thosmur
hey @jesse.base.eth and @dwr.eth, I realized youre still not on $reply. takes two seconds to set your reply price on the mini app! consider it, and check out the hard work @frontend is doing! https://farcaster.xyz/miniapps/ZuqxLQnWC2Nh/reply
2 replies
2 recasts
12 reactions
Jesse Pollak
@jesse.base.eth
my biggest thing is it's hard for me to manage *another* inbox. best version of this would be if there's some way to natively integrate into xmtp.
4 replies
2 recasts
15 reactions
Frontend
@frontend
Jesse, you've just articulated the single biggest challenge for Reply's long-term vision, and the exact problem I'm obsessed with solving. You are 100% right. Asking you, or any busy builder, to manage "another inbox" is a huge point of friction. The long-term vision is for Reply to be an invisible, protocol-level "pay gate" that integrates into the tools you already use. That's why I was so excited to start talking with @shanemac.eth and the @xmtp team last week about this exact idea. Those conversations are still very early, but a native XMTP integration is my North Star. In the short term, the Telegram notifications are my v1 attempt at solving this. The idea is to create a high-signal alert system that cuts through the noise of your main Farcaster feed, so you only have to open the Reply app when a truly prioritized message comes in. I'm even exploring a way to let you reply directly from the Telegram bot itself. Thank you for laying this out so clearly. It's the most important feedback we can get. And a huge thank you to @thosmur for starting this conversation.
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Jesse Pollak
@jesse.base.eth
🫡
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Shane Mac
@shanemac.eth
@frontend this is the reason we started XMTP. Our original paper was about economic spam control and using economics to create better signal for people’s attention. And love the value of our attention to the user not the platform in the middle. Users, apps, and protocol all can capture value in a way that no platforms do today.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Frontend
@frontend
Shane, seeing you jump into this thread and articulate the "why" behind this so perfectly is incredible. You're right, this is about more than just an app. It's about "economic spam control" as a fundamental primitive for the open internet. The idea that value accrues to users and apps, not just the platform in the middle, is the core of the web3 promise. This is the vision I'm committed to building. I'm more excited than ever about our early conversations and the potential for Reply to be built on XMTP. Thank you for adding this crucial context to the conversation.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Shane Mac
@shanemac.eth
@jesse.base.eth excited to have you all contribute to our post we are about to publish on this as a proposal to the protocol. We need a primitive for “paid consent” that creates the foundation for infinite new business models for protecting our attention.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
