Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
At the UN Open Source Conference, I joined a breakout session on funding open source. We discussed tensions between current funding models, sustainability, and incentives with maintainers from Python Software Foundation, Processing Foundation, Linux devs, etc I brought up crypto...and things got interesting... ↴
2 replies
2 recasts
11 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
First takeaway: Sporadic funding = stalled momentum. Many OSS projects lack consistent financial support, making it hard to plan for long-term stewardship, security, or growth.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
We discussed funding types like: → Corporate sponsorship → Government grants → Civic tech & philanthropy → Consumer donations → Paid features → Crypto Each model has tradeoffs.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
Corporate sponsorship often skews priorities. Maintainers shared stories of feeling pressured to prioritize features requested by enterprise sponsors over what might actually be better for the project's long-term health, sustainability, or security. The incentive misalignment is persistent among projects.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
Government grants: what used to be consistently reliable is now very risky due to administrative cuts and shifting political climate. Several projects have shared that the grants that they were promised have now been cut and are now scrambling to meet needs.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
I brought up Crypto :) and it...sparked a conversation 😅 When I brought up crypto / tokens as another form of capital / fund raising, those familiar with the space were generally open to the discussion, but they also shared stories of significant push back from their communities
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
Here’s the concerns they shared: → tokens could create artificial hype around a project → pump & dump schemes from unknown participants → market manipulation leading to reputational damage → unexpected fluxes in funding (volatility)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
However, given the unreliability of traditional funding pathways, people were really open and driven to find more sustainable resources and to explore diverse and alternative funding pathways
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
Maintainers wanted to understand how Ethereum's funding mechanisms worked, how crypto orgs sustain themselves, and what kinds of mechanisms work at scale
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
As legacy funding continues to fall short for many OSS projects, this moment presents a unique opportunity for crypto ecosystems to lead a new way: → community-first approach → aligned incentives → transparent governance → novel mechanisms like quadratic funding, deep funding, @meritsystems
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Feven pfp
Feven
@feven
because when your government grant gets slashed and your corporate sponsors start making demands that hurt your project... ...the risky crypto option starts looking like the only stable one
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

xR0am | tip.md pfp
xR0am | tip.md
@xr0am-
@feven thanks for this reporting, it’s very interesting and completely aligned with my initial vision behind @tipdotmd. I spoke about it below. For me it’s not tokens that projects should focus on, I agree can perverse incentives, but receiving mainstream ones in a frictionless way from the users is the solution imo. Would love to connect and chat more about this. https://farcaster.xyz/xr0am-/0xce2c0a02
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction