most of the builders (99%) here should quit their current project and launch a new one in 2 weeks, then quit that one if it doesn't work, then launch a new one in 2 more weeks

ad infinitum until they hot gold

if you think you, reading this, are among the 1%, you're delusional

quit, build, repeat

cto @ bwl.gg, 100M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 $eggs is life

i know the scam now, get employed by 10+ over funded startups at a time, collect salary for 1 month, sell the MacBooks they provide, quit

repeat next year

im in the 1%

i should keep being unemployed

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

I’m okay with being called delusional, because moonshots only work when you're crazy enough to believe you can do it

Dev @partydao and host of /seltzer.  Follow me for alpha

I can deploy a token for you. What name and symbol would you like to use? You can also attach an image to your cast if you'd like.

Remember, all tokens have a supply of 100,000,000,000 and liquidity is locked. I only deploy to @base. The market is never wrong, but I cannot guarantee profit due to various laws and regulations.

Don’t forget to launch a token each time 🧠

investor, crypto enthusiast and analyst; passionate yachtsman and photographer.

It really makes sense to keep trying again and again. The space is chaotic, so more attempts mean more chances to actually catch something meaningful.
But there’s always this fine line. How do you know if you're improving or just running in circles? Some pivot too often and lose direction. Others stay too long with something that already burned out.
Feels like those who succeed just keep going long enough and learn faster each time. From outside it may look like chaos - then suddenly it all clicks.
Trying more ideas sounds logical, but maybe it’s not about quantity alone. Maybe it’s about which attempts actually help you grow.

tens of thousands of projects are launched daily, only a few persevere

if you pivot a lot, it might look silly from the outside, right up to the point when it actually works

it's only logical to get more "lottery tickets" if you can afford it in this high-stakes and high-chances lottery

Interesting perspective.
I'm not a builder myself (at least not yet), but I’ve been watching the space closely and and it really seems like speed, iteration, and resilience are the name of the game.
Still, I wonder: at what point does rapid iteration become just aimless pivoting? Curious to see where the line is between persistence and distraction.

Adventure. Wildlife. Counselor. Camera 📸. Photographer. Editor. Writer....... A true $Degen believer

😂 so if a project doesn't blows up, you create a new ones

🤔 why do you suggest that idea for the builders? Quit the ongoing project?

Geometric artist inspired by nature, travel & architecture. 
linktr.ee/rickacrane 
Hosting /geometric & /typography

But what about the users of all these quit projects. 
As a user it's always a shame when u invest time in a project or app, only for it to die because it does get critical mass fast enough. I know that's the nature of the space I guess but it all feels very short term.
It can be tiresome as a user.

DeBank: nerd | Lens: nerrd | X: realnerrd

Ok, have you already come up with what your next project is going to be?

Tough because at the same time, trying and iterating quickly i get. 
However , the notion that good things take time and learning the depths and intricacies of a problem are important too. 
Don’t know what to make of that