Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/politics
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EulerLagrangodamus pfp
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange
Only in the US could we be required to pay into social security, a program that has a -4% return, and people still fight for it to exist.
7 replies
2 recasts
36 reactions

Jeff Excell 🎩 pfp
Jeff Excell 🎩
@jeffexcell
My parents rely on this.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BrixBountyFarm 🎩 pfp
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
Not going to say there aren’t problems with SS, yet I’ve always thought of it as a safety net for lower income earners. And less of social security as “my investments”. Would be happy to see cap raised further to increase the sustainability of it going forward. Could have been managed much better though.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jared pfp
Jared
@javabu.eth
Thank you for posting in /politics 1000 $Degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Chainleft pfp
Chainleft
@chainleft
Or maybe it's intentionally sabotaged after decades of curtailing to result in -4% return. Because other countries are quite happy with their social security.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

littleshrimp pfp
littleshrimp
@littleshrimp
People fight for it to exist because they’ve been paying into it their whole lives. If the government wants to give me a lump sum of what I paid (with some interest) I’d call it even.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

lin567 pfp
lin567
@0567567.eth
pitiful
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

casemidio.base.eth pfp
casemidio.base.eth
@casemidio
we have the same in Brazil, full ponzi shit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tmophoto  pfp
Tmophoto
@tmophoto
What percentage of elected officials are old enough for it?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction