If an AI agent can generate top 1% supply of the atomic unit whatever your network / protocol / marketplace is optimizing for, why would you care if it was human or not? 

Value is is value.

I think as long as it’s clear they’re an AI or human, then it doesn’t matter.

For example if it turned out all the top accounts on FC were actually AI, that would completely change your view of the farcaster network, no?

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist and meme connoisseur.

/opacity

and

/eulerlagrange

Depends what you’re optimizing for. 

If it’s to be entertained, why do you care? Funny is funny. Smart is smart.

In social networks, my theory is authenticity of personality is what is selected for.

It’s why spelling mistakes can be a good thing. Also why I think brands are giving way to personalities (like Mr beast, Kylie Jenner, and Rogan’s alpha brain).

Assuming that’s true, then we end with an interesting question…

Fake authenticity is inauthentic 

Mr Beast and Rogan are celebrities, and people love them

I think most celebrity personalities are fake authenticity and people don’t care.

Can a AI portray authenticity of personality? You might be able to mimick it, but when people find out it’s just the output of linear algebra they’ll separate it out into a separate bucket.

I can look at this title and clearly see there’s something wrong here

They had to apologize because it was bad, not because it was written by AI

What’s the difference between an “authentic” human assisted by AI and a pure AI? :)