What's a controversial issue on which the average person who disagrees with you has better moral character than the average person who agrees with you?

People who disagree with me on animal rights, like traditional farmers or hunters often show strong moral character through their deep care for nature and tradition. Meanwhile, some who agree with me may do so for shallow reasons. Moral disagreement doesn’t always mean bad character.

Active Farcaster user with a talent for driving engagement and moderating with intention.
Open to mod, comms, or support roles across crypto-native projects.

imo people who hunt for subsistence score much higher on animal rights than people who eat factory farmed food

Would *you* rather:

(i) live 50% of your natural life, then suddenly drop dead
(ii) live a 50%-long life in a tiny cage where you get force fed lots of fat all day, then drop dead in a more horrific way

… whatever way people have of reducing the suffering of animals is good.  (Especially the larger, social animals). 

It could be opting out completely and being vegetarian/vegan, or drastically reducing or eliminating red meat, or only getting meat from smaller, local farms… or like mentioned in this comment thread, hunting your own meat.