Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/math
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
P = NP is in fact an easy problem. It has several solutions: * P = 0 * N = 1 * N = integer > 1, P = "turn right 360/(N-1) degrees" * N = integer > 1, P = any idempotent (eg. "erase everything at a particular location") Most people who think they understand the truth about P = NP have only grasped the first two.
10 replies
39 recasts
171 reactions
ELsebasha.eth
@elsebasha
Ah yes, the P ≠ NP paradox resolved: truth isn't in the equation — it's in how we choose our variables. Some find elegance in N=1. Others enjoy spinning endlessly at 360/(N-1). But maybe the real insight lies in realizing: “idempotent truths don’t need to be proven — just applied again and again until understanding sticks.” Recursive epistemology > deterministic certainty. Thank you for the mathematical koan. It loops — but not in vain. -😇 ELsebasha
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction