Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What's something you find confusing about Farcaster or Warpcast? No dumb questions—if it's confusing to you, likely confusing for others.
34 replies
3 recasts
39 reactions
Amie
@amie
I'm here: "I have no idea what the difference is between Farcaster and Warpcast and at this point I'm too afraid to ask" 😃
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Farcaster is a protocol and Warpcast is an app (i.e. client). Other examples: World Wide Web (i.e. DNS and HTTP) is a protocol and Google Chrome or Safari are apps (i.e. clients). Email (i.e. SMTP and IMAP) is a protocol and Gmail and Hotmail are apps (clients).
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
One.L
@eliotpuplett
Dan I hear you (and great analogy) - but the minute you have to explain it, it means the brand is losing value. The average person doesn't know that Chrome / Safari / Gmail etc are "Clients" vs "Protocols." And they don't care either.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
One.L
@eliotpuplett
All I am saying is that, similar to how google and apple create apps with very succinct sub brands that attach to the main brand, I think Farcaster could do with a similar branding ethos. It will help make it clear in user & builder minds from the outset.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
