Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
this place was cooler when everyone felt they were experts in things other than geopolitics
23 replies
5 recasts
80 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Seems reasonable that people would discuss a major world network on a social network they are active on. “Experts” means nothing. You’re either knowledgeable or not. You don’t need a credential to have an informed opinion.
4 replies
2 recasts
52 reactions
DV
@degenveteran.eth
I often think of this...
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
my usage of "experts" was being facetious seeing lots of uninformed assertions from people who are not knowledgeable plenty of that on x as well.. but over there one can also find properly informed opinions from a large number of voices (see @mazmhussain's feed) https://farcaster.xyz/geoffgolberg/0x7ade4bd1
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Social networks serving the dual purpose of (i) broadcasting genuinely valuable alpha / analysis / insight / intel / predictions (better and faster than any traditional media can), and (ii) allowing the unfiltered belching of mid opinions (of which everybody has one, like a certain anatomical feature) is the medium's fundamental conundrum. Both are given equal representation by default That's why, for actual discussions that extend beneath surface takes, I favor Reddit where at least the community does the legwork of assigning positive or negative karma, which generally bubbles up the best takes (if you sort your feed accordingly) And karma compounds over time at the account level
1 reply
1 recast
16 reactions
moodles.base.eth
@rinch.eth
For ordinary people like us, three meals a day are the most important.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction