cto @ bwl.gg, 100M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 $eggs is life

Creative output isn’t infinite. Most of us get a couple hours max of truly high-leverage work a day. If you dilute that across 2-3 “big ideas,” you’re not multiplying impact you’re just dividing momentum.

everybody is creative, ideas are a dime a thousand 

no one wants to build, and even fewer people want to pivot when their idea doesn't work

creative input is infinite, scaling productive output is a skill few posses

Could be argued that similar drive could be applied to former project if you still believed in it and it would most likely pick up.

curious about crypto UX. occasionally fun(ny). Unfiltered thoughts and truths

Your argument actually proves the point.

Slack != Glitch.

Glitch (a discrete product) failed. Slack, a bespoke suite of communication tools they created in-house was productized and launched as a new thing.

They discarded the failure, and moved back to what they were good at, which was communication tools.

Hard disagree; 

Slack was originally a failed game called Glitch. Nobody cared. But the dev team loved the internal chat tool they built to communicate.

Pinterest spent a year with almost zero traction. Took 2+ years to hit product-market fit.

Notions early version failed. They shut down and rebuilt the entire thing from scratch in 2017. Look at it now. 

Sometimes the most important quality to have as a founder is to believe in the product itself

statistically, chances of a dead project picking up because founders still believed and put more effort into it, are miniscule

your product either works on the market or no one cares about it

clearly visible within two weeks of launching