Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/miniapps
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tony D’Addeo pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
share extensions is on its face less intuitive name than cast actions given mini apps can use these for all sorts of actions I still think it's a good name: - follows an iOS UI pattern — the idea you're sharing some resource to an app and that app let you take some arbitrary action on it has precedent - share extension makes it clear to the user they are accessed from the share menu - usage is low to the point of not justifying its own button so moving into the share sheet is a nice simplification for feed UI simplification - new users will naturally stumble upon once they add a mini app and share a cast instead of needing to click an unrecognizable icon - cast actions with a dedicated button was also unintuitive and confusing for many users
1 reply
0 recast
19 reactions

Tony D’Addeo pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
cc @manan who had a comment on the unintuitiveness of this on the original proposal, wdyt
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Manan pfp
Manan
@manan
share extensions makes sense for most of the use cases. I was nit-picking the narrow usecases to see if there's other good alternatives, but I haven't been able to come up any better ones either. 🚢
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction