Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
A very underrated flippening: It feels like these days when open source software devs make software with UIs *that runs locally*, a lot of the time the UI is built *as a webpage* and you access it by going to localhost:3030
16 replies
30 recasts
156 reactions
Fidel Ramos
@framos.eth
I actually like it, much lighter than an Electron UI for example, and more portable. The web browser is the ultimate compatibility platform.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Bethany - countessellis.eth🎩
@ellis
Why move it local in that case? What’s the benefit over deploying it on a high performance server and accessing it remotely?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Fidel Ramos
@framos.eth
Who's gonna pay for the high performance server? With the local server the user pays for the compute. Also nice that data can remain local.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Bethany - countessellis.eth🎩
@ellis
Why not take advantage of the enhanced graphics and capabilities if it’s only going to be ran locally? The advantage of web based interfaces is remote interaction without local installation. Even using something as light weight as TK can give a better experience and more powerful interface.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Dean Pierce 👨💻🌎🌍
@deanpierce.eth
Graphics and capabilities of web apps seem to be way more powerful and standardized than any of the "native" UI toolkits. Web frontends can easily be ported to any platform, everything else was a huge mess. This might have been a more pronounced problem for me as a Linux user, but web UX seems like an obvious win.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
