Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pepe
@cypherfrog.eth
ZK is already here. No one explained why🗣️🧶 Everyone’s building ZK. Every deck screams “privacy.” But no one explains why it matters — not in human terms. Because “privacy” is one of those words no one questions, but almost no one actually feels. And without feeling, there’s no urgency ⤵️
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pepe
@cypherfrog.eth
2/6 People click, farm, bridge — never thinking every move is logged forever. One dashboard, one address, and your entire history is a map: habits, patterns, ties. And when you show them, they shrug: “So what? I’m not doing anything wrong.” ⤵️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pepe
@cypherfrog.eth
3/6 That’s the disconnect. ZK isn’t about hiding crimes. It’s about choice. Asymmetry. Not being watched by default. You lock your door not because you're guilty — but because it’s yours. But no one says it like that. They hope the tech speaks. It doesn’t ⤵️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pepe
@cypherfrog.eth
4/6 There’s another audience: funds, whales, politicians. They won’t say “we need privacy.” They’ll say “secure infra.” It sounds cleaner. Admitting it would mean admitting risk. But they’ve felt it — doxxed wallets, copied trades, sniped positions. They know. They’re just quiet ⤵️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pepe
@cypherfrog.eth
5/6 But not for long. Onchain data is already evidence. Wallet screenshots lose users. Participation becomes a liability. And then it flips: “Where’s our ZK?” But it comes too late — after headlines, after damage. Infra doesn’t ship on panic ⤵️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pepe
@cypherfrog.eth
6/6 The ones at risk act like nothing’s wrong. The ones asleep feel no threat. The ones building can’t explain. But ZK was never about secrecy — it’s about control. Boundaries. A way to stay human in a system that sees you as a wallet with history. Before it's all allowlists ⏹️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
