Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/base-builds
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mel 🐶🍄 pfp
mel 🐶🍄
@troopdegen.eth
We're building something and we want to fetch random Farcaster users What's the best way to get "real" users? Thought about the Pro NFT, but I missed out and I don't want more people to feel like sad like me 🤣 We're using Neynar, we just need a reliable way to fetch data from real "users"
7 replies
1 recast
15 reactions

Colin Charles pfp
Colin Charles
@bytebot
Neynar user score. Checkout Warpcast labels for spam. Pro nft might help but we may have 1/4 spammy in the first 10K. There’s a lot of independent work being done to figure out real users… @mwr @cryptonjal dune dash, etc.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
It is very difficult to distinguish real casters from the rest. Neynar score and spam labels often give contradictory information. Perhaps in contradictory cases the Openrank can be looked at (not tested). Pro subscription remains no quality indicator so far. In addition, there are good functional bots (do you want to exclude them?) that cannot be distinguished from the rest. Finally, there are groups of accounts that show the same activity behavior, but are not all labeled as spam. In addition, you could perhaps look at whether a spam label is stable or changes again over time.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Colin Charles pfp
Colin Charles
@bytebot
We should always look at openrank also. I find @recaster-fc to be very comprehensive here so thanks @haole - we should also see other metrics like @ruminations is building. What are good functional bots with a pro sub? I would exclude them. A bot is a bot (unless it’s bytebot, a human ;-)) I think similar activity behavior is probably the spam label needing to be more aggressive. At this point I look at the neynar score. I also suspect for most label 2 that are human, their labels rarely change over time. I’ve asked for this kind of dataset but we don’t have it per se, right?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Njal pfp
Njal
@cryptonjal
@mvr has a dataset with spam label changes. Last time I checked (long time ago) there where casters where their spam label changed 14 times
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Colin Charles pfp
Colin Charles
@bytebot
Wow. That’s some aggressive changes and I wonder if they were ultimately just spammers. I mean - you, me, etc - if we are already deemed non-spammer, what would turn us into a spammer? We are legit humans, verified elsewhere, etc too
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction