Farcaster Union

Monthly Farcaster figures 🧵:
- MAU spam label 2 (purple) is still in uptrend (91.8k) ✅
- MAU spam label 0 (red/orange) is still in a downtrend (57.8k) ✅
- MAU no spam label (grey) is in an uptrend, with 71,6k active this month 👀 (The Warplet effect)

New MAU (55.1k) is still in an uptrend
Atm 174 of that MAU got spam label 0, and 39 spam label 2.

Interests: crypto, economics, TA & blockchain related innovations | 🔗 https://linktr.ee/cryptonjal 🔗 https://dune.com/nhejyht

McWarp

Interesting to see that FC had a relative normal inflow of new casters, who were immediate active. Imo The Warplet effect. Which part are normal users and which part farmers have to tell time. Interestingly, inactive spam labels 0 and 2 don't seem to have suddenly woken up to mint a Warplet(!). This begs the question of why there is a significant new amount of active users, if people with a dormant account don't bother? This supports, imo, the findings I shared yesterday (https://paragraph.com/@cryptonjal/the-warplets-the-farm-figures).

Spam label 2 still seems to be growing steadily, which is good, although I am now curious which part are 'spam label 2' farmers.

Check more charts here:

Interesting to see that FC had a relative normal inflow of new casters, who were immediate active. Imo The Warplet effect. Which part are normal users and which part farmers have to tell time. Interestingly, inactive spam labels 0 and 2 don't seem to have suddenly woken up to mint a Warplet(!). This begs the question of why there is a significant new amount of active users, if people with a dormant account don't bother? This supports, imo, the findings I shared yesterday (https://paragraph.com/@cryptonjal/the-warplets-the-farm-figures).

Spam label 2 still seems to be growing steadily, which is good, although I am now curious which part are 'spam label 2' farmers.

Check more charts here: https://dune.com/nhejyht/farcaster-monthly-dashboard