Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
am i wrong to think that GCP Cloud SQL absolutely should not cost $254/month for the base instance type? this seems wildly expensive
5 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Antoine pfp
Antoine
@antoinedc
Yeah gcp is way too expensive for dbs. Take a look at fly.io, less managed but more reasonably priced. I migrated there from gcp
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
I use Firestore for our db but Fly for our backend. If you can get past the Firestore constraints it’s pretty solid
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Antoine pfp
Antoine
@antoinedc
If you have a good data structure, yeah. I didn't and once things started to scale the bill I was getting were insanes πŸ˜…, it was easier to move to postgres than to change the structure.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction