Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
What are your favorite "long century" dividers? (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_nineteenth_century ) Mine so far: 1643-48: Ming -> Qing transition, end of 30y war (treaty of Westphalia), Galileo dies and Newton born 1789: French revolution, dawn of formalized chemistry (Lavoisier) 1911-17: Xinhai revolution, WW1, Russian revolution, theories of relativity 2020-23: COVID, end of pax americana, AI passing Turing test
36 replies
46 recasts
415 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
1870, roughly the point Brad DeLong marks as the shift from ~2% growth in the world economy to systematically higher, in Slouching Towards Utopia. One of the most rigorously defended dividers of this sort. https://www.amazon.com/Economic-History-Twentieth-Century/dp/0465019595 I am more a fan of 400-year periodizations than 100 personally (short half-milleniums instead of long centuries). In the book club I'm running this year, we're doing 1200-1600, "pre-modernity." The bookends for that period are the 4th crusade and the trials of Galileo, Bruno etc.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Chance
@chancetaken
+1 on the Brad DeLong one (1870-2010ish I think he does). Robert Gordon's 1870-1970 is probably my favorite and his Rise and Fall of American Growth is my favorite book partly bc it details the spectacular shifts during this time period. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_American_Growth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
