Murtaza Hussain pfp
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
Just insane
6 replies
3 recasts
53 reactions

amc pfp
amc
@amc
In fairness to this initiative, if China, India, and other rising, largely producing countries don’t sign on to climate accords are they even worth the paper they’re written on?
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Chainleft pfp
Chainleft
@chainleft
China and India produce miniscule greenhouse gas emission per capita compared to the USA or EU. China especially has implemented far more green initiatives than the USA.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

amc pfp
amc
@amc
How would you anticipate those per capita movements as those countries continue to gain wealth? China accounts for ~30% of global emissions currently. You can twist per capita all you want. This issue only gets solved technologically
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Chainleft pfp
Chainleft
@chainleft
What you call twist is typically called "data" by others but hey, whatever distracts from the USA.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

amc pfp
amc
@amc
I have holistic data you shifted to per capita, which I also refuted. You’re making a 10 year old argument for an “accord” that has been ineffective. Numbers don’t lie, global emissions are way up. The world is competitive, throttling energy consumption has costs too. Like I’ve said numerous times in this thread the one and only solution is technological
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction