six
@six
i am excited by zora's creator coin update. imo most "socialfi" attempts to-date have failed because traditional social tokens lack any underlying economics; they are closer to memecoins and just move up and down reflexively, most of the time burj khalifa-ing after the meta shifts on to something new. zora's update shifts social tokens one step closer to investing in a creator business instead of investing in a creator memecoin, with the first revenues being fees generated from the content coins paired in the creator token. mechanism-wise this feels like the end state to me, the hard part now (always has been etc.) is growing adoption of the coining behavior - for the above to be true, creators still need to actually coin stuff and traders/investors still need to actually buy content coins. gg to the team.
12 replies
8 recasts
66 reactions
matthew chaim
@chaim.eth
>the first revenues being fees generated from the content coins paired in the creator token. is this the case? the content is paired with the creator coins, but fees generated flow to the creator, not the creator coin (nor its holders). or did i misunderstand what you’re saying?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction