Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
I like the idea generally and will have to consider it, but for a couple of things - I'm not totally sold on the leaderboard algo as it currently is and don't really want to subsidize that - many of the people at the top of the leaderboard I don't know of and/or interact with - I don't want my money to support builders who actively look down on my people (replyguys) - It'd be nice to be able to have more say in where your subscription fees specifically go (see above - I'd like to prioritize my money going towards replyguys more than "builders") If we were able to be a bit more intentional with where our specific subscription fees go (instead of a general fund) I'd be more excited for the idea, I don't think it's bad on its face
8 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions
cc235
@cc235
Want
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction