Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/higher
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

colfax pfp
colfax
@clfx.eth
discuss agreed, but what does moving to X [like bankr] look like? bankr had a solid product that made sense to proliferate. how would you apply that model to higher? imo higher needs to nurture what currently exists on farcaster - there’s nothing to move to X if there’s nothing here rn
6 replies
2 recasts
8 reactions

catra ↑ pfp
catra ↑
@catra
“You can't connect the dots looking forward; only looking back.” I think we don’t need to expand to X yet. Better to focus on what we’ve already started in Farcaster. From a product view — what are we offering now? There’ve been cool Higher experiments, but they’re scattered. No single product the community rallies behind. Before expanding, maybe we need one thing that truly represents us.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

catra ↑ pfp
catra ↑
@catra
or the meme is the product, how we proliferate the higher meme as product offering?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

colfax pfp
colfax
@clfx.eth
agreed with focusing on farc. could be one specific thing we all rally around, or a multitude of things that make up the whole. imo higher is most exciting when there’s more than a few things moving at once. but also interested in aligning around one specific goal
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction