Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
Tbh I'm shocked that the Ethereum community hasn't cited Berachain as a reason for *not* trying to tie ETH token to deeper onchain metrics, like proof of Liquidity. Berachain has been down only due to teams effectively Curve War style vampire attacking the chain, so the value of BERA has been dropping vs. Wrapped "yield bearing" BERA. Since ETH only serves as a call option on a future onchain action, this dynamic isn't worth it, but since Berachain has the added mechanism of driving rewards to specific stakers, cartels are naturally driven to bribe to maximize rewards to their validators at the expense of BERA.
3 replies
1 recast
21 reactions

Catch0x22 pfp
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
i was wondering what might be the catalyst for that conversation what's a better option, basket of assets?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
For Bera or Ethereum? I might have been wonky with words here, but I like Berachain. Its just been obvious holding spot BERA is not optimal. The same with ETH, but where ETH and Beta differ is the premium for the "staked ETH" version of Bera is massive due to capital farmers. I guess I'm saying I'm not sure if any economic games Ethereum ever played to boost its value would actually mean value acrues to token holders. Maybe the optimal strategy is do nothing?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions