Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I'll repeat more broadly: decentralized social networks (whether crypto or non-crypto architectures) are limited by supply of interesting and entertaining content. If you increase the supply, audience will follow. Everything else is downstream of that.
11 replies
0 recast
40 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
The "interesting" qualifier is key: 1m carefully curated and thoroughly thought casts by me, are less interesting than a single "hello farcaster" cast from a sports, music or politics celebrity -or even their teenage kid. This has been the inflection point for every social network.
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Jacob
@jrf
i think this is right there is definitely a viable decentralized social thesis that there are communities that want a more direct channel with content creators, but how does farcaster enable that rn better than instagram, youtube, tiktok, etc? what's the secret sauce that'll get content creators to immigrate to farcaster? h/t some thoughts @cameron has shared recently
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
we need to prove to creators they can either make more money sustainably or grow their audience more easily we can help them do the same things better or empower them to do new things they can't do elsewhere that's basically all that matters
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacob
@jrf
thanks for the insights, i think you're 100% right audience seems to be the key, so i guess it's up to the creators on farcaster with the biggest audiences to prove that this is not only possible but more easily achievable the *new things* category is interesting bc there's a lot of creative possibilities there, but perhaps also a lot of unfamiliar territory which could be a barrier to many avg users 2000 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction