Should DAO proposal execution establish an on-chain time arbitration mechanism to prevent delays? Implementing such a system could ensure timely execution by enforcing predefined deadlines, reducing human error and disputes. Smart contracts could automatically trigger actions or penalties if deadlines are missed, enhancing efficiency and trust. However, it risks rigidity, potentially limiting flexibility for complex proposals needing extended deliberation. A balanced approach might combine time arbitration with override mechanisms for exceptional cases, ensuring both discipline and adaptability in DAO governance.