If crypto wants to disrupt, it needs to rebalance. Hollywood/modern media is the perfect place to start because it is so one-sided. 

Not because its 'too liberal' or even because its 'top-down', it's because the loudest people (streaming and studio heads) struggle to understand the gravity of each decision they make. 

Crypto has the balance mechanisms to give more power to the audience to find better actors, writers, directors, etc... Isn't that what crypto aspires too? To give chance to voices that would otherwise be overlooked in the late-stage analog world?

If crypto wants to matter in media start small — Fund indie artists transparently. Skip the revolution and attack real pain points — Automate residuals & royalties. But avove all prove value — Build one project that outperforms Hollywood — not just out-hypes it.

Otherwise, it’s just libertarian fan fiction.

There's always local news: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_Media

The ownership model of the web actually seems like a path beyond the eternal Craigslist and elbowing in FB marketplace, thumbtack et all that have devestated the classified sections that were a cash cow of local media

Antiques dealer, machine psychologist. http://www.musicinphasespace.com