Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
Has anyone tried experimenting with an ERC721/ERC20-like contract where the owner of the asset is a Farcaster FID instead of a ETH address?
2 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

KMac pfp
KMac
@kmacb.eth
moxie kinda sorta does this via soulbound iirc but it's still an eoa under it not exactly what you are pointing at. interesting to think about this. what property would it add?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
Mostly just trying to push the boundaries of the idea space. One potential is it makes the asset Farcaster or perhaps even app specific, which provides another level of exclusivity. Also could make it controllable via app keys.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction