Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Bitfloorsghost pfp
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
was always curious about this - is it adjusted simply by the number of followers, or is it adjusted by number of active followers? would be much more representative of real engagement if it, say, didn't count followers who haven't been active in a week+ or so
8 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions

Bitfloorsghost pfp
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
Also does this include bots that aren't shown on farcaster itself but are on other websites that pull data or are those cut out of the equation too?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

arfonzo pfp
arfonzo
@arfonzo.eth
If you're asking about the rewards leaderboard, It's a function of active followers. Check point 3. It's the cube root of active followers (excluding spam labelled).
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Mikado pfp
Mikado
@mikadoe.eth
It's active followers if I can remember correctly
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Darla pfp
Darla
@darla
What if I have no one to engage my casts
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mikasa🦋🖤 pfp
Mikasa🦋🖤
@ayeeshaxoxo
I figured out that most of all these write-ups are bullsh**
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Johnny Bravo 🎩 pfp
Johnny Bravo 🎩
@johnnybravo01
i still can't wrap my head around the algo for this every week i could barely make it to the rewards leaderboard despite being active and engaging with every tom, dick and harry on farcaster now I'm at the 3000th spot this week lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Number of active followers in the last week or so. So inactive accounts don’t hurt you.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction