teddit

I've thought a lot about AI art and whether or not we should think about it as art. You can read all about it in this article. From the article title you can probably guess where I fall on this topic.

I've thought a lot about AI art and whether or not we should think about it as art. You can read all about it in this article. From the article title you can probably guess where I fall on this topic.
https://www.fxhash.xyz/article/in-defense-of-ai-art

i loved this paragraph btw. quick feedback: please put this into paragraph frames so people can read inline, or share a specific quote you want people to engage with.

other than that, would love to know the framework @emodi, @sanjay, @0xen, and @bchow use to consider AI or generative art as "art"

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

Generative artist | Software Engineer @ Warbler Labs contributing to Goldfinch | https://www.chowbrandon.com/

Computational biologist, data scientist, digital artist | 
https://clauswilke.art/links | Hosting /ai-art & /clauswilke

building farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud” 🤠

Effort does not equal quality. But honed practice in a particular artistic medium (painting, writing, photography) better allows an artist to express their intent. Sustained effort (a practice) implies quality.

I find lots of AI art low-quality, and I don't know if I would consider it a medium so much as a tool.