Will Papper pfp
Will Papper
@will
Over 3,000 sailors. Under 24 hours left before we set sail. Join now! https://adrift.syndicate.io/
14 replies
7 recasts
46 reactions

rish pfp
rish
@rish
should just sign in with farcaster :)
3 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

max ↑ pfp
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
maybe bake that as an option for fc miniapps?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rish pfp
rish
@rish
exists in our starter kit already if using that https://docs.neynar.com/docs/create-farcaster-miniapp-in-60s
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

max ↑ pfp
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
did anyone implement to try it out?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rish pfp
rish
@rish
yeah there's a large number of mini apps in the ecosystem built using this starter. is there a question behind the question? my comment was just user feedback on the adrift app itself, was not meant to be a discussion about neynar on this thread
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

max ↑ pfp
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
no worries was just curious if there was a popular mini app using email as a primary sign up that I haven't seen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rish pfp
rish
@rish
but the email sign in is not from us (and no I dont think there are popular mini apps with email sign in) that's why I was asking to switch to Farcaster sign in I thought you were asking about farcaster sign in being baked in but you're asking about email sign in?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

max ↑ pfp
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
yeah lots of things got mixed up and confused during our convo I mean farcaster already has our emails and maybe that could've been used in some of these mini apps where developer doesn't want to connect to the wallet? in this case though dev just wanted to spin off embedded wallet to any external email right
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Will Papper pfp
Will Papper
@will
SIWF is coming! It’s being added by our wallet provider (Para)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

rish pfp
rish
@rish
yes to the last question I dont think the client exposes email or phone numbers at all to developers since that is considered private data
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction