My response to AI 2027:

https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/07/10/2027.html

The AI 2027 post is high quality, I encourage people to read it at https://ai-2027.com/ 

I argue a misaligned AI will not be able to win nearly as easily as the AI 2027 scenario assumes, because it greatly underrates our ability to protect ourselves, especially given the (pretty magical) technologies that the authors admit will be available in 2029 in their scenario.

I didn't read it yet but it's one thing to have superhuman ai do something and completely different to have actual humans gather resources and build something new/better or something already existing - more efficiently

governments for example will take a long time, likely years to understand only the basics of ai to allow it to be used widely in crucial industries

exploring new frontiers in tech, ai, states, farcaster DAU since 2023, product background /basedstudio

I'm talking more about real world stuff that ai can't synthesize or affect besides pixels on our screens