With the rise of SocialFi/InfoFi and my participation in them through various projects, I'm left with a mind buggling question that I feel founders of these projects should ask; does views and engagements equal substance? The reason for this is that there are various small accounts (1000 followers and less) that make more meaningful contributions to the web3 space than way bigger accounts, but these accounts don't get as much views or engagements, if any at all, yet the bigger accounts are perceived to have more substance. InfoFi projects say they reward quality over quantity, so why are these small accounts not being rewarded? 

I think they need to reaccess their analysis metrics to make room for small accounts that actually have substance, else the whole aim of InfoFi would be defeated and it'd be nothing but a farce. The AIs that analyze accounts to ascertain quality are greatly flawed in that they can be easily gamed. They need to be reprogrammed to capture real substance.