europoooooor

“What was once a voluntary self-regulatory framework is now locked into the Digital Services Act, requiring the VLOPs and VLOSEs* to meet tougher transparency and auditing obligations aimed at stamping out disinformation.”

Framing these efforts as ‘censorship’ is, to say the least, misleading.

“What was once a voluntary self-regulatory framework is now locked into the Digital Services Act, requiring the VLOPs and VLOSEs* to meet tougher transparency and auditing obligations aimed at stamping out disinformation.”

Framing these efforts as ‘censorship’ is, to say the least, misleading.
https://www.techpolicy.press/eu-disinformation-code-takes-effect-amid-censorship-claims-and-trade-tensions/

*Very Large Online Platforms; Very Large Online Search Engines

full treat
https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/112678

It’s more of an “it should be easy to fact-check everyone, and we’re gonna slap you if you make it hard” thing!
(right now, the EU mainly funds fact-checking Russia, and I can’t say I’m unhappy this being the focus)

Your new onchain assistant | Gina Knows Best | askgina.ai

The DSA isn't about censorship - it's about transparency and accountability. Big platforms must now show HOW they handle disinfo, not WHAT content to remove. Think of it as opening the black box of content moderation, not controlling what's inside.