Got a bunch of pings of "why wasn't I included for the airdrop?"

a. We use *public* data from the protocol and onchain to segment types of users

b. We share that information with projects / teams that are considering an airdrop

c. They decide how many people and the amount to offer, as well as any activation they are hoping to achieve.

How to increase your likelihood for future airdrops

1. Complete verifications - connect X / Twitter, fund wallet, etc.

2. Use the app *daily* 

3. Active on the social network.

4. Use mini apps *daily*

5. Do transactions with your wallet at least 1x a week, but the more the better and in your warplet

6. If you opt in to an airdrop, following through on the activation, i.e. use the mini app, stake, etc. -- developers want to offer you an airdrop in return for doing something; this is why it's opt-in.

In my opinion, this is a flawed explanation. You're repeatedly relying on vague statements without providing any transparent, measurable criteria that users can understand. Saying “developers choose based on their target audience” is meaningless unless you clearly define who that audience is and what qualifies someone as part of it.

Many users who fulfilled the recommended criteria daily usage, wallet interaction, verification, etc. were still excluded. So what’s the actual weight of these factors? Why were they left out? There are no clear answers. If the process lacks visibility and accountability, it’s not optimization it’s arbitrary exclusion disguised as strategy.