Atalay pfp

Atalay

@atalay

180 Following
209 Followers


Atalay pfp
14 replies
2 recasts
55 reactions

Atalay pfp
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Atalay pfp
3 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

Atalay pfp
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Atalay pfp
1 reply
0 recast
21 reactions

Atalay pfp
2 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

Atalay pfp
1 reply
1 recast
29 reactions

Atalay pfp
I’ve supported this protocol for a long time active daily usage, verified identity, onchain interactions, you name it. I’ve been here through bugs, downtime, and awkward transitions because I believed in what was being built. And yet, when it came time for the $WCT airdrop, there was no transparency, no criteria, and no recognition for those contributions. Many dedicated users were left out without explanation. When we asked, the only response was vague lines like “developers choose their audience." Now, instead of addressing the community’s frustration, you introduce a $10/month subscription. Seriously? After all we’ve done now we’re supposed to pay for a badge and features we helped shape? This isn't just disappointing it’s insulting. If you want people to invest in this protocol’s future, start by respecting its past. Start by treating your early supporters with the fairness and transparency they’ve earned. @dwr.eth
0 reply
0 recast
17 reactions

Atalay pfp
1 reply
0 recast
25 reactions

Atalay pfp
2 replies
0 recast
20 reactions

Atalay pfp
0 reply
4 recasts
22 reactions

Atalay pfp
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Atalay pfp
1 reply
3 recasts
16 reactions

Atalay pfp
4 replies
0 recast
14 reactions

Atalay pfp
1 reply
2 recasts
17 reactions

Atalay pfp
1 reply
1 recast
16 reactions

Atalay pfp
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions

Atalay pfp
I have some serious concerns regarding your recent $WCT airdrop. First of all, there was no transparency about the eligibility criteria. You asked users to check the app, yet many myself included found nothing there. This lack of clarity leads to confusion and disappointment across the community. We’ve seen a similar issue during the $Monad airdrop as well no clear guidelines, no feedback, and ultimately, no trust. Right now, some users have even started flagging the app as spam due to the repeated letdowns. This is a dangerous path that can result in significant user loss if not addressed. If you plan to distribute a future airdrop using the same unclear methods, it could seriously damage your reputation and user base. You’re building something valuable but transparency, fairness, and proper communication are essential to keeping the community engaged. Please take this feedback seriously before more trust is lost.
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions

Atalay pfp
5 replies
25 recasts
72 reactions

Atalay pfp
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions