"are there any zoomers who dislike content coins?"

my zoomer friends:

building farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud” 🤠

Isn’t buying a subscription kinda like buying stock in a creator

Reporter and writer. I cover energy, climate change and geopolitics. Contact me via my website www.alexanderckaufman.com and subscribe to kaufman.nyc.

And unlike a subscription that remains stagnant, buying a token/stock of a creator early can be rewarding for both you and the creator should the creator gain popularity.

Coinbase employee (Investigatooor), personal account. Onchain is the future.

It'd depend on how the mechanics of the token are structured. what @kaufman described could certainly be possible -- just direct a % of ongoing revenue back proportionally to early supporters

or, as in the current zora coin meta, it'd rely on selling the token at a higher price; but that's not the only way it can be designed

No the creators split remains the same based on the trading volume of their content. 

The idea being that if the creator grows in popularity, their supporter can sell a portion of the 'stock' or tokenized content they bought early for a higher price than they purchased as demand grows.

the idea being that the creator is paying out part of what they're earning via ads and subscriptions to the purchaser of the token? i'm just confused as to how this works with an individual