Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The challenge with channels is there’s no consensus on what they should be. 1. Distribution vs. niche interest 2. Open but tons of mod work vs. Closed but frustrating for new users A lot of this is a result of our iteration on the feature and not having anything work. A simpler version not dependent on the Farcaster app—but not emphasized by it, would most likely mean other app developers could solve for the various cases. And now with mini apps, you could imagine channel-specific clients as mini apps. https://farcaster.xyz/dwr.eth/0x19ce197c https://farcaster.xyz/dwr.eth/0xd7e9b71b
23 replies
15 recasts
85 reactions

Arjan | That Poetry Guy pfp
Arjan | That Poetry Guy
@arjantupan
I think channels have evolved into different things, and it will be hard to try and find one fitting alternative for them. Part of the channels (food, travel, art, degen, farcaster) have the effect of hashtags. You can find posts on a topic there, and maybe using hashtags (or other forms of keyword searches) is a better solution for that use. Other channels (/poetry , /f1, /live-the-same, /los-fomos, /farcasterunion are more communities or cozy corners. They have a different function. /firefits is another example. These channels are destinations. I might not visit the channel pages immediately, but I have a feeling (and expect that) posts in these channels show up in my home feed. Even though I was sceptical of channels at first, because I did not know how to use them, I came to love the channels that are cozy corners and communities. They serve a purpose. Maybe you can find a way forward in separating the usage along these lines? I think it's adjacent to what @nounishprof already wrote.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction