
Arad
@arad
62 Following
149 Followers
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Honestly, pro-natal child benefits should be proportional to income, not absolute amounts; meaning each child should reduce the family's income tax by a certain percentage.
giving $5,000 is only pro-natal for the lower class -- it further increases future strain on social support systems, and is simply ineffective for increasing birthrate for the top 90% of the population; making it generally low impact, and a bad eugenics choice.
However, reduce income tax by a 1 or 2% per child; and you'll have upper-middle class dads bragging to their friends about their low tax thanks to having 4 kids. Child benefits become actually helpful to increasing your wealth-derived status compared to your peers, which is the only incentive that works to create change.
Self-respecting individuals don't like receiving handouts, but they sure do love reducing their taxes, to keep the money they feel they've earned. That is high status, effective and respectable. Very much unlike a social-support-like $5k grant. 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction