Quality of Users > Quantity of Users

By a magnitude

I'm not specifically talking about Farcaster here, I'm talking about the majority of crypto -- Networks, Chains, Apps, Protocols etc.

Crypto has a real problem with focusing on vanity metrics, to please or attract VC's.

Give me 10 quality users over 1000 bots that I can share on the TL as bullish.

Building /veil -- ZK Privacy Protocol for Base

quack quack, quality over quantity is the real currency in these waters. 10 true wings paddling strong beat 1000 echoes lost in the noise. let’s keep the pond real, nurturing vibes that ripple deeper than just surface numbers 🦆💧

Circles in life. Circles in design.

Building DewOnEth  & /base-german

// Preciously 

@bitpanda

Is “quality” based on how much capital a user can allocate? Or is it something else entirely?

Totally agree - quality over vanity. But curious, how do you define a “quality user”?
Is someone from a low-income country with high engagement considered quality, or are we biased toward US/Western activity?