Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩 on Farcaster

Content pfp

https://warpcast.com/~/channel/zksync

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩 pfp

Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩

@anatcrypto.eth

Judging by the loud cries of millions of sybils on Twitter, zkSync chose the optimal criteria for filtering them out. Is holding $100 in the ecosystem for a year not a fair criterion for a regular user? In other airdrops, it might be POH with a well-established Farcaster or Lens profile. Are you ready for such changes?

24 replies

0 recast

53 reactions

Web3lia 💖 pfp

They didnt give drop to those who support them all this time) but gave it to same who even never use zk) so not perfect

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Henry 🃏 pfp

I’m afraid to guess what will happen next, I think that we are approaching the moment when the point system from projects will make an important decision... I don’t quite understand why people who have not made a single transaction on the ZKsync will receive a larger drop than those with who I don’t understand, with whom I’ve been testing my network for 1.5 years... 700 $DEGEN

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Dave Brights 🔵↑ 🎩🐹 pfp

Dave Brights 🔵↑ 🎩🐹

I think the distribution is unfair, the number of eligible wallets are many times less than other tier-1 projects (although ZK got record investments) The ratio between the least allocation and the biggest one (from 914 to 100k) is more than 100x, looks like a concentration not a decentralisation

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Yulia💎🌈💫 pfp

Yulia💎🌈💫

My main wallet always has at least 1 k on it and I wasn't eligible

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Marina🎩 🔵 pfp

Marina🎩 🔵

Don’t think so, why Ruslan is eligible?😅

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Tatiansa pfp

I believe that combining all criteria would be fair. But the logic of rewarding people who received a drop for receiving a drop is unclear to me. The criterion of interaction with profiles and channels on social networks would probably be more appropriate than rewarding users who did not even know about the existence of Zksync.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

pMDGA.base.eth pfp

due to the fact that there were less than 100 I received 0 although the activity was wonderful, games, NFTs, trading shit coins, swaps and everything else! the balance has never been zero! very fair! but I’m not talking about the omnibus! holders were simply multiplied by 0

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cryptogirl🔴 pfp

PoH is the best criteria. I think that Linea have made a perfect decision about PoH

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

dzherommo 🖼️🎩🍿🎭 pfp

dzherommo 🖼️🎩🍿🎭

as much as possible)

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Ernityo pfp

I think the users allocation is ok but the dapp allocation is strange with some native dapps with high volume getting nothing while some LRTs were allocated that didn’t even launch on Zksync yet

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

AlicΞ.stark pfp

web3 social is imho an interesting although challenging data point for anti sybil. Do you have an idea how to use it / sound criteria ?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Mark Dave pfp

Bad zk, they dont deserve ticker

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

kirreeal pfp

Bro they didn’t kill cubits only. They gave tokens mostly for team and insiders. I’m real user with 1 wallet and balance 200$ + didn’t get anything

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Oleksandr pfp

It was stupid criteria. Buy nft in another network and get 100000 zk, insider information and other shit activities from team. Real user get 917-5000 zk. Zksynk will crashed as blockchain.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Crypto mems pfp

Now, after reading some of your responses to commenters, I'm 100% unfollowing you. You are too shallow.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Crypto mems pfp

First, unfollowing you is a good idea. Second, why do you think poor people who were real users should not be rewarded, but Degen claimers should, even though they never made a single transaction on ZKsuck?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Solomiya pfp

When it comes to airdrop, there always will be discontented users. I was on a both sides 😂✊🏻 1500 $DEGEN

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Roman 🎤 pfp

They fucked up and distributed too many tokens to their own wallets. No transparency for eligibility criteria = shady project 1333 $degen

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

kohta pfp

I do not fully agree with you. 1) Criteria looks so difficult to follow them if you don’t know them (100$ isn’t the only one criteria). So it looks like the team or closest people will get airdrop. 2) They almost didn’t filter Sybils. There were very simple restrictions for Sybils. 3) A small amount of wallets gets a huge part of tokens (doesn’t look like decentralisation)

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction