coins

building wyat.live, bondes.xyz and fiids.xyz

building @frens · a16z css23 · 🟪 /purple · 🍊 /orange-dao · hosting 🚢 /the-arena  🌎 /nomads  ⌨️ /workspaces

crafting farcaster.in + terminal.co + @usetab // from cape verde 🇨🇻

cofounder & product /builders-garden /farville | 
 organizing /just-frame-it | hosting a web3 hub in rome /urbe-eth /ethrome 🇮🇹🐺

Rome, Metropolitan City of Rome Capital, Italy

helping /bracky, playing /bracket reading /greatbooks

Onchain startups. Farcaster app store (@farstore) and tips (@tipn)

project coins: bullish or not?

curious about:
1. what “project coin” means to you?
2. how you see it helping builders?

i’ve been experimenting with ways to support builders for 4+ years, and this new narrative feels promising

two that i noticed so far:
→ gitfish.dev = coins for GitHub repos
→ believe.app = coins for project ideas

any other interesting takes?

would love to hear your thoughts @jessepollak  @limone.eth @pcbo  @tldr @carlos @alvesjtiago.eth @dylsteck.eth @kompreni @jx @jpren.eth @phil

building @talent to help builders stand out 
| caretaker at /build

late to this discussion but I truly believe new business models will emerge to compete with the current default subscription models.

on the other hand: the volatility, misaligned incentives and short term thinking around coins make them hard to become a long term sustainable source of income for developers / teams (in my opinion).

I'm still hopeful there's a way to solve the issues above while keeping it simple to explain like a subscription model. what have you seen so far?

i have a similar opinion 

i see the potential a but haven’t seen a sustainable, easy to understand model most developers outside of crypto would be comfortable with