Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
In you're in favor of "AI safety" (broad definition), what's your most compelling cast-length argument?
33 replies
30 recasts
107 reactions

AlicΞ.stark pfp
AlicΞ.stark
@alice
why should a superior, unbiased system act in favour of mankind?
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Alberto Ornaghi pfp
Alberto Ornaghi
@alor
why it should not? in the end it is trained on what we wrote. it will not be unbiased. it will learn from what we think.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mike pfp
Mike
@mikejuz
That’s the question And even if we determine that it SHOULD work for us, we have no idea how to imbed that into AI
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

kripcat.eth pfp
kripcat.eth
@kripcat.eth
100%. We have no way of knowing what an intelligence that dwarves our own, that is functionally immortal, and so with a completely different perspective on time, would value.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

187 pfp
187
@arthurfleck.eth
Good question tbf
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction