will pfp
will
@w
pls discuss cc @ted
6 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
his answer is true at scale, but doesn't account for nuances or smaller armies". example: when i went on WW2 tour, i learned the "night witches" were an all-female soviet bomber and sniping regiment that the nazi's feared. war has always been gendered and coded as male with females positioned as caregivers and supporters — and most women aren't interested in combat roles. that being said, they do have interest in non-combat military roles. women may not be as physically strong, but they're typically better at impulse control, situational awareness, etc.; % of women growing in surgery (precision), intelligence analysis, etc. emerging defense tech increases pool of non-combat military roles. if war can be fought with autonomous and AI-powered systems and remote combat, it changes who is best positioned to excel at it. will be interesting to see if there is a shift, but also need to be mindful of employees at defense tech vs. actual enlisted military members.
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

shoni.eth pfp
shoni.eth
@alexpaden
That’s a regiment btw, army is defined by largest force in a country In that case not even middle eastern countries would qualify— nonetheless women have played a role in war, maybe most strategically important were code breakers Generally speaking it would be like talking about the male role in child birthing tho
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
hmmm i would say "raising a human" more than birthing, which .. it takes a village, and also as humans we specialize and trade https://warpcast.com/w/0xda6ccc5d
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
yeah, agree with everything. tried to highlight that nuance with "true at scale" but you definitely know more than me.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction